Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2023 May; 71(5): 1877-1881
Artículo | IMSEAR | ID: sea-224994

RESUMEN

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the pattern of follow?ups and the reasons for follow?up loss in keratoplasty cases in a tertiary eye care center. Methods: This is a single?center retrospective cross?sectional study. During the study period, 165 eyes underwent corneal transplantation. The data on the demographic features of the recipients and the indications of keratoplasty, including visual acuity before and after surgery, duration of follow?up, and the condition of the graft at the last follow?up, were collected. The primary outcome was to determine the factors causing lost?to?follow?up (LTFU) among graft recipients. LTFU was defined when a patient failed to adhere to any of the following seven follow?up visits since the surgery: 4 ± 2 weeks, 3 ± 1 months, 6 ± 1 months, 12 ± 2 months, 18 ± 2 months, 24 ± 3 months, and 36 ± 6 months. The secondary outcome was to analyze the best?corrected visual acuity (BCVA) among patients available for the final follow?up. Results: The recipient follow?up rates at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months were 68.5%, 57.6%, 47.9%, 42.4%, and 35.2%, respectively. Old age and distance to the center were significant factors for lost?to?follow?up. A failed graft as an indication for transplantation and those undergoing penetrating keratoplasty for optical purposes were significant factors for completing follow?up. Conclusion: The inability to follow?up after corneal transplantation is a common challenge. Elderly patients and those living in remote areas must be prioritized for follow?ups.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA